



Recently we were discussing pricing of cloud hosting versus traditional ‘shared hosting’ and ‘dedicated server hosting’ (in an internal work mail thread). As a consultant, I dabble in my own domains and hosting, and have often sought out the cheapest option for what I needed. This has bitten me before, having services hosted with US hosting companies with no accountability, and I now host stuff (like this blog) on Australian servers.
But I thought it somewhat hypocritical to have a blog about the cloud and not host it in the cloud as well , so I started to investigate pricing with the various providers like GoGrid and EC2. I decided that I would be more than happy to go through the pain of moving from my shared host if I could get a single virtualised server that I could throw all my domains at, for around the same price or less.
But the more I investigated, I just couldn’t see the pricing working in my favour – not for my single server scenario where scalability is not really required (I need a few more hits yet – tell your friends!). I made my calculations based on the lowest end server available, with minimal bandwidth and storage. I estimated 730 hours in a month on average. Here’s the numbers:
| Host | Per Hour | Per Month |
| My Shared Host | - | $24.95 |
| Amazon EC2 | $0.125 | $90.00 |
| GoGrid | $0.19 | $138.70 |
Ok I realise we’re not comparing apples with apples here. Each service offers differing functionality and is really designed to offer economies of scale, whereas my shared host is designed for my exact market.
So if you are looking at entry level, I guess the point is really: don’t bother.
That being said, what about at the other end, where your company can benefit from scalability and other distributed aspects of cloud computing? Well I have no answer to that, however this post on Google groups presents some interesting arguments around why cloud computing may never actually be viable. Its worth the read.










More Options ...

Categories
Tag Cloud
Blog RSS
Comments RSS

Void
Life
Earth
Wind « Default
Water
Fire
Light 
10:01 pm - March 31st, 2009
[...] Read this article: Above The Cloud » Blog Archive » Shared Hosting vs Cloud Computing … [...]
7:26 am - April 8th, 2009
[...] Above The Cloud » Blog Archive » Shared Hosting vs Cloud Computing … [...]
6:52 pm - July 14th, 2009
Although shared hosting is a less expensive way for businesses to create a Web presence, it is usually not sufficient for Web sites with high traffic. These sites need a dedicated Web server, either provided by a Web hosting service or maintained in-house. With shared hosting, numerous web sites are sharing a single server.
8:27 am - July 15th, 2009
Last night pricing was announced for Azure so you can get an idea what it might be like to account for scalability for high traffic sites with Microsoft. If you can scale with virtual machines, do you necessarily need a dedicated box?
4:39 am - July 22nd, 2009
Pretty cool post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say
that I have really liked reading your blog posts. Anyway
I’ll be subscribing to your blog and I hope you post again soon!
5:19 am - August 11th, 2009
Shared hosting is good for personal websites …. my opinion.
9:03 am - August 12th, 2009
Oh I certainly agree. I’ve had up to 10 domains hosted for tiny sites (such as my past blogs, friends websites, etc) for years and I could not have achieved this without shared hosting. I also appreciate that a lot of shared hosting plans are very well setup for on-selling – you can create your own mini-host and give your clients control panels, etc. The downside is that this cheap resource has also allured unreputable individuals into the game because its so easy to setup and get going.